On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:15:15 +0200 (EET) Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +static ssize_t revoked_file_aio_read(struct kiocb *iocb, > > + const struct iovec *iov, > > + unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos) > > +{ > > + return -EBADF; > > +} On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Alan Cox wrote: > Do we need both -EBADF and -EXNIO versions. It is hard to tell from > existing OS's as they don't support revoke of files just special files ?
No, we don't. We should always do EBADF except for close(2) which is zero always and make read(2) zero for special files. On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:15:15 +0200 (EET) Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +static ssize_t revoked_special_file_read(struct file *filp, char __user * > > buf, > > + size_t size, loff_t * ppos) > > +{ > > + return -ENXIO; > > +} On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Alan Cox wrote: > Bezerkly Unix returns 0 for the special file read case Aah, I'll fix that up. Thanks. Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/