On 07/01/17 00:44, Michał Zegan wrote: > seems the patch works as intended. >
So, can we take this as Tested-by: Michał Zegan <[email protected]> ? > W dniu 06.01.2017 o 13:34, Sudeep Holla pisze: >> Currently we add the virtual cpufreq device unconditionally even when >> the SCPI DVFS clock provider node is disabled. This will cause cpufreq >> driver to throw errors when it gets initailised on boot/modprobe and >> also when the CPUs are hot-plugged back in. >> >> This patch fixes the issue by adding the virtual cpufreq device only if >> the SCPI DVFS clock provider is available and registered. >> >> Fixes: 9490f01e2471 ("clk: scpi: add support for cpufreq virtual device") >> Reported-by: Michał Zegan <[email protected]> >> Cc: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]> >> Cc: Michael Turquette <[email protected]> >> Cc: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> -- Regards, Sudeep
