On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:

> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >   it's clearly a configuration variable, but it's also being used by
> > > itself in a few drivers/net/ source files.  is that deliberate?
> >
> > The ones in drivers/net/ are just local driver debug controls.
> > They happen to have the same name as a (likely newer) kconfig symbol.
> >
> > Is there a real problem that needs to be fixed?
>
> Renaming them just for the sake of being less confusing makes sense.

that's kind of what i had in mind.  i have a script that peruses the
source tree, checking for apparent typoes in preprocessor directives
when someone forgets the leading "CONFIG_", and as long as that macro
name is the way it is, that example is going to be flagged every time
for no good reason.

if someone wants to make a suggestion, i can submit a simple renaming
patch.

rday

-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to