> Minor nit below > > >> + >> + for (i = NVME_CMB_CAP_SQS; i <= NVME_CMB_CAP_WDS; i++) >> > I'd prefer seeing (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(..); i++) because it provides > automatic bounds checking against future code. >
Thanks Jon, I will take a look at doing this in a V1. Stephen
