On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:38:32PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The "samsung,exynos5433-mipi-video-phy" and "samsung,exynos5250-dwusb3"
> DT bindings don't specify a reg property for these nodes, so having a
> unit name leads to the following DTC warnings:
>
> Node /soc/video-phy@105c0710 has a unit name, but no reg property
> Node /soc/usb@15400000 has a unit name, but no reg property
> Node /soc/usb@15a00000 has a unit name, but no reg property
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
>
> ---
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
> index 3695ddaf2e04..17e5dafd392c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
> @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@
> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 0xf04>;
> };
>
> - mipi_phy: video-phy@105c0710 {
> + mipi_phy: video-phy {
> compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-mipi-video-phy";
> #phy-cells = <1>;
> samsung,pmu-syscon = <&pmu_system_controller>;
> @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> - usbdrd30: usb@15400000 {
> + usbdrd30: usb-0 {
How about "usbdrd" instead of "usb-0"? It would be still quite a generic
description of a class.
> compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dwusb3";
> clocks = <&cmu_fsys CLK_ACLK_USBDRD30>,
> <&cmu_fsys CLK_SCLK_USBDRD30>;
> @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> - usbhost30: usb@15a00000 {
> + usbhost30: usb-1 {
usbhost?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dwusb3";
> clocks = <&cmu_fsys CLK_ACLK_USBHOST30>,
> <&cmu_fsys CLK_SCLK_USBHOST30>;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
