Quoting Srivatsa Vaddagiri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:12:00PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > I have a question? What does rcfs look like if we start with > > the code that is in the kernel? That is start with namespaces > > and nsproxy and just build a filesystem to display/manipulate them? > > With the code built so it will support adding resource controllers > > when they are ready? > > If I am not mistaken, Serge did attempt something in that direction, > only that it was based on Paul's container patches. rcfs can no doubt > support the same feature.
My first nsproxy control fs was not based on Paul's set, but was very nsproxy-specific. After that I based it on Paul's set. The nsproxy subsystem is in Paul's latest patchset. On top of that set I've posted a set to implement namespace entering, but that is on hold (or dropped) because the only people so far interested in namespace entering don't like an fs interface. If you wanted to take my original non-container fs nsproxy interface and try to rebuild resource containers on top of them I don't think you'll get anything better than containers, but then maybe you would... -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/