On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 01:31:47PM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 11/01/2017 11:52, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > On 01/11/2017 01:07 AM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> >
> >>> @@ -134,12 +134,15 @@ static int tangox_wdt_probe(struct platform_device
> >>> *pdev)
> >>> err = clk_prepare_enable(dev->clk);
> >>> if (err)
> >>> return err;
> >>> + err = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
> >>> + (void(*)(void *))clk_disable_unprepare,
> >>> + dev->clk);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> + return err;
This looks wrong. There is no clk_unprepare_disable when
devm_add_action_or_reset fails.
> >>
> >> Hello Guenter,
> >>
> >> I would rather avoid the function pointer cast.
> >> How about defining an auxiliary function for the cleanup action?
> >>
> >> clk_disable_unprepare() is static inline, so gcc will have to
> >> define an auxiliary function either way. What do you think?
> >
> > Not really. It would just make it more complicated to replace the
> > call with devm_clk_prepare_enable(), should it ever find its way
> > into the light of day.
>
> More complicated, because the cleanup function will have to be deleted later?
> The compiler will warn if someone forgets to do that.
>
> In my opinion, it's not a good idea to rely on the fact that casting
> void(*)(struct clk *clk) to void(*)(void *) is likely to work as expected
> on most platforms. (It has undefined behavior, strictly speaking.)
I would expect it to work on all (Linux) platforms. Anyhow, I wonder if
there couldn't be found a better solution.
If in the end it looks like the following that would be good I think:
clk = devm_clk_get(...);
if (IS_ERR(clk))
...
ret = devm_clk_prepare_enable(clk)
if (ret)
return ret;
...
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
