On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 03:00:06PM +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
> The configuration data provided by an MCFG region (ie PCI segment and
> bus range) may span multiple host bridges.
> 
> Current code in pci_mcfg_lookup() carries out an exact match of host
> bridge bus range start value against the MCFG region(s) bus range start
> value which would cause configurations like the following:
> 
> MCFG region:
>       bus range: 0x00~0xff.
>       segment: 0.
> 
> PCI host bridges configuration (segment numbers and bus ranges):
>       host bridge 1:
>               bus range: 0x00~0x1f.
>               segment: 0.
>       host bridge 2:
>               bus range: 0x20~0x4f.
>               segment: 0.
> 
> to fail, in that the bus range start value for host bridge 2 does
> not match the bus range start value of the respective MCFG region.
> 
> Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() to cater for
> PCI configurations with multiple host bridges sharing the same
> MCFG region.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>

Applied to pci/enumeration for v4.11 with the following changelog:

    PCI/ACPI: Fix bus range comparison in pci_mcfg_lookup()
    
    The configuration data provided by an MCFG entry, i.e., PCI segment and bus
    range, may span multiple host bridges.
    
    pci_mcfg_lookup() previously required an exact match of the host bridge
    starting bus and the MCFG starting bus, which made the following
    configuration fail:
    
      MCFG region:
        segment: 0
        bus range: 0x00-0xff
    
      host bridge
        segment: 0
        bus range: 0x20-0x4f
    
    Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() so we can use any MCFG entry
    that contains the required bus range, as we do in pci_mmconfig_lookup().
    
    [bhelgaas: changelog]
    Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <[email protected]>
    Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
    Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <[email protected]>
    Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> index a6a4cea..2944353 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> @@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root, struct 
> resource *cfgres,
>               goto skip_lookup;
>  
>       /*
> -      * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than
> -      * specified by caller.
> +      * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range.
>        */
>       list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) {
> -             if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start &&
> +             if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start &&
>                   e->bus_end >= bus_res->end) {
>                       root->mcfg_addr = e->addr;
>               }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to