On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:55, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > Greg, > > > > > > Please consider applying the patch below. It switches struct device_type > > > to using attribute groups which os more flexible. I am using it in my > > > input class_device -> device conversion (which is 99% done btw). > > > > Argh, I never sent you my version of that, did I? Very sorry about > > that, I was working on fixing up the device namespace issue first, which > > isn't done yet :( > > > > Anyway, my patch that did that is below, feel free to use it or not if > > you want. > > > > > I looked through -mm and the latest git and there does not seem to be > > > any users of struct device_type yet... > > > > Yes, the input patch below uses it and I have a block-device patch from > > Kay in my tree that Andrew doesn't pull from (as it's usually really > > messed up and I know to hide this kind of breakage from him...) > > Oops, that patch didn't use it, this follow-on patch from Kay uses them. >
Ok, so input portion in your tree does not use type->attrs so we don't have a conflict here. Unless my patch messes up Kay's blockdev patch badly I'd like you to accept it. Input uses 3 attribute groups and I don't want to open-code their creation/removal. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
