On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Eric Paris wrote:
> which didn't have my fix up because i didn't commit it to my local
> branch. Is there a better way to get a diff between my miller tree and
> 'everything in the branch I have checked out even if it is not
> committed'?
I'd suggest you commit all your changes in local branches, then export
them as emails via git-format-patch for posting.
Something like:
davem-upstream [1]
+- for-davem [2]
+- for-davem-prep [3]
Do all of your work in [3], so you can manage the queue of patches there
before merging/applying them into [2] as a final patch series.
So, if one of the commits in [3] needs fixing, you can, for example,
export commits up to that with git-format-patch, git-reset --hard to the
broken commit, fix, compile, test then reapply the exported commits.
Then, once it's all ready, merge into [2] (or export & apply to avoid
merge commits).
This is just one possible workflow. There are probably several better.
- James
--
James Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
