* Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:
> > [sounds of rummaging around in the Git tree]
> >
> > I found this commit of yours from ancient history (more than a year ago!):
> >
> > commit 12d560f4ea87030667438a169912380be00cea4b
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue Jul 14 18:35:23 2015 -0700
> >
> > rcu,locking: Privatize smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()
> >
> > RCU is the only thing that uses smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(), and is
> > likely the only thing that ever will use it, so this commit makes this
> > macro private to RCU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >
> > So I concur and I'm fine with your patch - or with the status quo code as
> > well.
>
> I already have the patch queued, so how about I keep it if I get an ack
> from the powerpc guys and drop it otherwise?
Yeah, sounds good! Your patch made me look up 'RelAcq' so it has documentation
value as well ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
