On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 10:05 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> When using the a device with edge-triggered interrupts, such as MSIs,
> the interrupt handler has to ensure that there is a point in time
> during
> its execution where all interrupts sources are silent so that a new
> event can trigger a new interrupt again.
> 
> This is achieved here by looping over SSSR evaluation. We need to take
> into account that SSCR1 may be changed by the transfer handler, thus
> we
> need to redo the mask calculation, at least regarding the volatile
> interrupt enable bit (TIE).

Could you split this to two patches, one just move the code under
question to a helper function (no functional change), the other does
what you state in commit message here?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> -----------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> index dd7b5b4..24bf549 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> @@ -737,6 +737,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ssp_int(int irq, void *dev_id)
>       struct driver_data *drv_data = dev_id;
>       u32 sccr1_reg;
>       u32 mask = drv_data->mask_sr;
> +     irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
>       u32 status;
>  
>       /*
> @@ -760,37 +761,42 @@ static irqreturn_t ssp_int(int irq, void
> *dev_id)
>  
>       sccr1_reg = pxa2xx_spi_read(drv_data, SSCR1);
>  
> -     /* Ignore possible writes if we don't need to write */
> -     if (!(sccr1_reg & SSCR1_TIE))
> -             mask &= ~SSSR_TFS;
> -
>       /* Ignore RX timeout interrupt if it is disabled */
>       if (!(sccr1_reg & SSCR1_TINTE))
>               mask &= ~SSSR_TINT;
>  
> -     if (!(status & mask))
> -             return IRQ_NONE;
> +     while (1) {
> +             /* Ignore possible writes if we don't need to write
> */
> +             if (!(sccr1_reg & SSCR1_TIE))
> +                     mask &= ~SSSR_TFS;
>  
> -     if (!drv_data->master->cur_msg) {
> +             if (!(status & mask))
> +                     return ret;
>  
> -             pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSCR0,
> -                              pxa2xx_spi_read(drv_data, SSCR0)
> -                              & ~SSCR0_SSE);
> -             pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSCR1,
> -                              pxa2xx_spi_read(drv_data, SSCR1)
> -                              & ~drv_data->int_cr1);
> -             if (!pxa25x_ssp_comp(drv_data))
> -                     pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSTO, 0);
> -             write_SSSR_CS(drv_data, drv_data->clear_sr);
> +             if (!drv_data->master->cur_msg) {
>  
> -             dev_err(&drv_data->pdev->dev,
> -                     "bad message state in interrupt handler\n");
> +                     pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSCR0,
> +                                      pxa2xx_spi_read(drv_data,
> SSCR0)
> +                                      & ~SSCR0_SSE);
> +                     pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSCR1,
> +                                      pxa2xx_spi_read(drv_data,
> SSCR1)
> +                                      & ~drv_data->int_cr1);
> +                     if (!pxa25x_ssp_comp(drv_data))
> +                             pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSTO, 0);
> +                     write_SSSR_CS(drv_data, drv_data->clear_sr);
>  
> -             /* Never fail */
> -             return IRQ_HANDLED;
> -     }
> +                     dev_err(&drv_data->pdev->dev,
> +                             "bad message state in interrupt
> handler\n");
>  
> -     return drv_data->transfer_handler(drv_data);
> +                     /* Never fail */
> +                     return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +             }
> +
> +             ret |= drv_data->transfer_handler(drv_data);
> +
> +             status = pxa2xx_spi_read(drv_data, SSSR);
> +             sccr1_reg = pxa2xx_spi_read(drv_data, SSCR1);
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  /*

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Intel Finland Oy

Reply via email to