> On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:37 PM, John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Felipe Balbi > <felipe.ba...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> writes: >>> Basically when plugging in various cables in different orders, I'm >>> occasionally seeing the following BUG splat: >>> >>> [ 86.215403] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u16:2/53/0x00000002 >>> [ 86.219164] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 9 >>> [ 86.226845] Preemption disabled at:[ 86.230218] >>> [<ffffff8008673558>] dwc2_conn_id_status_change+0x120/0x250 >>> [ 86.236894] CPU: 0 PID: 53 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Tainted: G W >>> 4.9.0-rc8-00051-gd5a7979-dirty #1702 >>> [ 86.246836] Hardware name: HiKey Development Board (DT) >>> [ 86.252100] Workqueue: dwc2 dwc2_conn_id_status_change >>> [ 86.257279] Call trace: >>> [ 86.259771] [<ffffff8008087c28>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a0 >>> [ 86.265210] [<ffffff8008087ddc>] show_stack+0x14/0x20 >>> [ 86.270308] [<ffffff80084343f0>] dump_stack+0x90/0xb0 >>> [ 86.275401] [<ffffff80080d8d94>] __schedule_bug+0x6c/0xb8 >>> [ 86.280841] [<ffffff8008a07220>] __schedule+0x4f8/0x5b0 >>> [ 86.286099] [<ffffff8008a073e8>] schedule+0x38/0xa0 >>> [ 86.291017] [<ffffff8008a0a6cc>] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x8c/0xf0 >>> [ 86.297846] [<ffffff8008a0a740>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x10/0x18 >>> [ 86.304150] [<ffffff8008a0a4a0>] usleep_range+0x50/0x58 >>> [ 86.309418] [<ffffff800866d8dc>] dwc2_wait_for_mode.isra.4+0x54/0xd0 >>> [ 86.315815] [<ffffff800866f058>] dwc2_core_reset+0xe0/0x168 >>> [ 86.321431] [<ffffff800867e364>] >>> dwc2_hsotg_core_init_disconnected+0x2c/0x310 >>> [ 86.328602] [<ffffff8008673568>] dwc2_conn_id_status_change+0x130/0x250 >>> [ 86.335254] [<ffffff80080ccd48>] process_one_work+0x118/0x370 >>> [ 86.341035] [<ffffff80080ccfe8>] worker_thread+0x48/0x498 >>> [ 86.346473] [<ffffff80080d2eb0>] kthread+0xd0/0xe8 >>> [ 86.351299] [<ffffff8008082e80>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 >>> >>> This seems to be caused by the dwc2_wait_for_mode() calling >>> usleep_range() while the hstog->lock spinlock is held, since >>> we take that before calling dwc2_hsotg_core_init_disconnected(). >>> >>> This patch avoids the issue by adding an extra argument to >>> dwc2_core_reset(), as suggested by John Youn, which allows us to >>> skip the waiting, which should be unnecessary when calling from >>> dwc2_hsotg_core_init_disconnected(). >>> >>> Cc: Wei Xu <xuw...@hisilicon.com> >>> Cc: Guodong Xu <guodong...@linaro.org> >>> Cc: Amit Pundir <amit.pun...@linaro.org> >>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh...@kernel.org> >>> Cc: John Youn <johny...@synopsys.com> >>> Cc: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org> >>> Cc: Chen Yu <cheny...@huawei.com> >>> Cc: Vardan Mikayelyan <mvar...@synopsys.com> >>> Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com> >>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.ba...@linux.intel.com> >>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> >>> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> >>> --- >> >> doesn't apply to my testing/next. Please rebase > > So these were rebased onto JohnY's tree here: > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_synopsys-2Dusb_linux.git&d=DwIBaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=U3o8uKoKhWme5_V9D-eeCkB11BFwt4KvWztBgdE9ZpA&m=eBJTBuJyU21iKJvHdy5FxqtxsVARo0iIqJGxMHrlbyQ&s=VIiAT32aG7s04G5NoOOthNdm2JX0eWjJpg62neY_-KI&e= > next > > And apparently have been merged there. I suspect he's going to submit > his entire tree there to you? > > JohnY: Is this right?
Yeah I'll get these issues sorted out with Felipe. Which may mean resubmitting everything the the proper order. Thanks, John
