Hello, again, I just saw that my 0.28 patch file was wrongly named 0.26 and that there is a new version 0.29 of RSDL that just came out... so here is the backported RSDL 0.29 to a 2.6.18.8 kernel.
This does compile but I did not got the time to fully test it yet. > > Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28 > > Full patch: > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched- > rsdl-0.28.patch > > Series: > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/ > > The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28: > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/sched- > rsdl-0.26-0.28.patch > > A similar patch and directories will be made for 2.6.21-rc3 > without further announcement > Once again, thanx Con for this nice piece of code. Also note that this patch already includes a few other patches from 2.6.19+ kernel and there might also be other small pieces of code comming from a 2.6.19+ kernel: PATCH 1: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.20.y.git;a=co mmit;h=ece8a684c75df215320b4155944979e3f78c5c93 PATCH 2: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.20.y.git;a=co mmit;h=08c183f31bdbb709f177f6d3110d5f288ea33933 PATCH 3: Original RSDL patches (thnx again Con) http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/ Due to the project I'm currently working on, this will, in the next few weeks, help me out comparing heavy loads on a Debian Sarge/Etch 32/64 platform. Suggestions on benchmark tools would greatly be appreciated. Again, duno if this will be helpfull for anybody... but who knows! - vin
sched-rsdl-0.29-backport-kernel-2.6.18.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
