On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20170117: > > The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the arm tree. > > The amlogic tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3676 > 4511 files changed, 139928 insertions(+), 85028 deletions(-)
Crypto now fails on arm allmodconfig: arch/arm/crypto/Makefile:25: These ARMv8 Crypto Extensions modules need binutils 2.23 or higher arch/arm/crypto/Makefile:26: aes-arm-ce.o sha1-arm-ce.o sha2-arm-ce.o ghash-arm-ce.o crct10dif-arm-ce.o crc32-arm-ce.o AS [M] arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.o CC [M] arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-glue.o /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S: Assembler messages: /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:817: Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q1h[1],r10' /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:817: Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q1h[0],r9' /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:817: Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q1l[1],r8' /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:817: Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q1l[0],r7' /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:818: Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q2h[1],r10' /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:818: Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q2h[0],r9' [many more similar scalar errors deleted] The 2.2.3 warning was there in the past, but it wasn't fatal. I'm using an older binutils 2.22 from the kernel.org crosstool stuff. Seems sfr's builds get the same issue: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12910945/ A mindless "git bisect run" comes up with: cc477bf645736739e69d31fdf715281ef0dd5f9b is the first bad commit commit cc477bf645736739e69d31fdf715281ef0dd5f9b Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> Date: Wed Jan 11 16:41:54 2017 +0000 crypto: arm/aes - replace bit-sliced OpenSSL NEON code Maybe binnutils 2.22 is finally too old? Paul. --
