On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
> A 1:1 mapping between CLOSID/"Resource group" to RMID, as Fenghua suggested
> is very problematic because the number of CLOSIDs is much much smaller than
> the
> number of RMIDs, and, as Stephane mentioned it's a common use case to want to
> independently monitor many task/cgroups inside an allocation partition.
Again, that was not my intention. I just want to limit the combinations.
> A 1:many mapping of CLOSID to RMIDs may work as a cheap replacement of
> cgroup monitoring but the case where CLOSID changes would be messy. In
CLOSIDs of RDT groups do not change. They are allocated when the group is
created.
Thanks,
tglx
