Hi, Thomas - On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 07:12:48PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > [...] > It does matter very much, because the fact that the warning triggers tells > me that it's placed in code which is NOT executed in task context. > [...] > We are not papering over problems.
Understood. We were interpreting the comments around access_ok to mean that the underlying hazard condition was different (stricter) than in_task(). If the warning could be made to match that hazard condition more precisely, then safe but non-in_task() callers can use access_ok() without the warning. - FChE
