On Jan 20 2017 or thereabouts, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > > From: Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> > > > > Without a scope defined, UPower assumes that the battery is provide > > power to the computer it's connected to, like a laptop battery or a UPS. > > > > Tested-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c > > b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c > > index 4eeb550..4aaf237 100644 > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c > > @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ static int hidpp20_battery_event(struct hidpp_device > > *hidpp, > > static enum power_supply_property hidpp_battery_props[] = { > > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS, > > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY, > > + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SCOPE, > > Actually, what is the code baseline for this patchset please? I don't > think I've ever seen hidpp_battery_props[] before. >
Sorry, I should have mentioned this was on top of your for-4.8/logitech-hidpp-battery (merged with for-next, but which was put on hold since last Summer). Cheers, Benjamin > Thanks, > > -- > Jiri Kosina > SUSE Labs >
