On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote:
> When CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS is disabled, it is preferable to remove related
> structures from struct task_struct and struct signal_struct as they
> won't contain anything useful and shouldn't be relied upon by mistake.
> Code still referencing those structures is also disabled here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <n...@linaro.org>
>
[snip]
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 11c5c8ab82..8e333e55a9 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1309,6 +1309,7 @@ void __cleanup_sighand(struct sighand_struct *sighand)
> */
> static void posix_cpu_timers_init_group(struct signal_struct *sig)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS
> unsigned long cpu_limit;
>
> cpu_limit = READ_ONCE(sig->rlim[RLIMIT_CPU].rlim_cur);
> @@ -1321,6 +1322,7 @@ static void posix_cpu_timers_init_group(struct
> signal_struct *sig)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sig->cpu_timers[0]);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sig->cpu_timers[1]);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sig->cpu_timers[2]);
> +#endif
> }
So apologies for not catching this earlier. I was just queuing this
up, when I noticed the style issue here.
Aren't in-function ifdefs frowned upon? Wouldn't it be better to do:
#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS
static void posix_cpu_timers_init_group(struct signal_struct *sig)
{
...
}
#else
static void posix_cpu_timers_init_group(struct signal_struct *sig) {}
#endif
And similar for most of the ifdef'ed out functions in this patch?
thanks
-john
