On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 22:23 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Mike the cpu is being proportioned out perfectly according to fairness as I
> mentioned in the prior email, yet X is getting the lower latency scheduling.
> I'm not sure within the bounds of fairness what more would you have happen to
> your liking with this test case?
It has been said that "perfection is the enemy of good". The two
interactive tasks receiving 40% cpu while two niced background jobs
receive 60% may well be perfect, but it's damn sure not good.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
