On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

> Hello Chanwoo,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> On 01/16/2017 03:46 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I think that this patch better to squash with patch3.
> > After applying the patch3, this driver doesn't use
> > the max77686_i2c_id table.
> > 
> 
> I usually prefer to separate each change in a different patch,
> AFAICT moving to use the .probe_new callback and removing the
> I2C id table are two different changes.
> 
> I can squash if that's the correct approach though, I will let
> Lee decide.

This should really be a single patch, as the previous one leaves this
code redundant, but ... meh!

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Reply via email to