Hi Catalin,

On 01/11/2017 01:06 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Some minor comments below, nothing fundamental (as long as you say the
> new sequence doesn't have the speculative TLB load problem I mentioned
> on a previous version).

This workaround is documented as providing functional correctness for
both explicit and speculative memory accesses.

>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
>> index 32682be..9ee46df 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
>>  #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>>  #include <asm/hwcap.h>
>> +#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
>>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>>  #include <asm/pgtable-hwdef.h>
>>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>> @@ -140,6 +141,18 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_do_resume)
>>  ENTRY(cpu_do_switch_mm)
>>      mmid    x1, x1                          // get mm->context.id
>>      bfi     x0, x1, #48, #16                // set the ASID
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_1003
>> +alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_QCOM_FALKOR_E1003
>> +    mrs     x2, ttbr0_el1
>> +    mov     x3, #FALKOR_RESERVED_ASID
>> +    bfi     x2, x3, #48, #16                // reserved ASID + old BADDR
>> +    msr     ttbr0_el1, x2
>> +    isb
>> +    bfi     x2, x0, #0, #48                 // reserved ASID + new BADDR
>> +    msr     ttbr0_el1, x2
>> +    isb
>> +alternative_else_nop_endif
>> +#endif
>>      msr     ttbr0_el1, x0                   // set TTBR0
>>      isb
>>      post_ttbr0_update_workaround
> 
> Please move the above hunk to a pre_ttbr0_update_workaround macro for
> consistency with post_ttbr0_update_workaround.

How should I deal with inputs to the macro?

A) Use no input parameters and hard code x0 usage
B) Use a macro input parameter for the new TTBR value (x0)
C) Something else

Thanks,
Cov

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code
Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Reply via email to