On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 07:38 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2007 07:11, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > Killing the known corner case starvation scenarios is wonderful, but
> > let's not just pretend that interactive tasks don't have any special
> > requirements.
> 
> Now you're really making a stretch of things. Where on earth did I say that 
> interactive tasks don't have special requirements? It's a fundamental feature 
> of this scheduler that I go to great pains to get them as low latency as 
> possible and their fair share of cpu despite having a completely fair cpu 
> distribution.

As soon as your cpu is fully utilized, fairness looses or interactivity
loses.  Pick one.

        -Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to