On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 07:38 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Tuesday 13 March 2007 07:11, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > Killing the known corner case starvation scenarios is wonderful, but > > let's not just pretend that interactive tasks don't have any special > > requirements. > > Now you're really making a stretch of things. Where on earth did I say that > interactive tasks don't have special requirements? It's a fundamental feature > of this scheduler that I go to great pains to get them as low latency as > possible and their fair share of cpu despite having a completely fair cpu > distribution.
As soon as your cpu is fully utilized, fairness looses or interactivity loses. Pick one. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/