On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:38:47 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On 25/01/17 13:32, Jean Delvare wrote: > > With a name like that, I assume that the ARM SCPI protocol is only > > useful on the ARM architectures. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[email protected]> > > Fixes: 8f1498c03d15 ("firmware: arm_scpi: make it depend on MAILBOX instead > > of") > > Cc: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> > > Cc: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <[email protected]> > > --- > > Please correct me if I'm wrong. > > I won't say you are wrong but the reason why it's named arm_scpi is > because the protocol was developed by ARM. It doesnn't mean only > ARM/ARM64 needs to use it, it can be used on any architecture for > inter-processor communication using any communication technique > (currently mailbox is the only supported in the driver)
OK, thanks for the clarification. In practice, what other architectures are using it? -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support
