On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Jean Delvare <jdelv...@suse.de> wrote: > The pinctrl-baytrail driver builds just fine as a module so give > users this option. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelv...@suse.de> > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Looks okay to me. FWIW: Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> > --- > This was discussed almost one year ago, with no clear conclusion, but > also no evidence that the driver can't be built as a module. Is there > any way to push this forward? > > drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- linux-4.7-rc7.orig/drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig 2016-07-12 > 14:35:36.024835842 +0200 > +++ linux-4.7-rc7/drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig 2016-07-12 14:35:44.735904433 > +0200 > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > # > > config PINCTRL_BAYTRAIL > - bool "Intel Baytrail GPIO pin control" > + tristate "Intel Baytrail GPIO pin control" > depends on GPIOLIB && ACPI > select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP > select PINMUX > > > -- > Jean Delvare > SUSE L3 Support -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
