On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Mark Rutland <[email protected]> wrote: > This reverts commit 13bed58ce8748d430a26e353a09b89f9d613a71f. > > While there does appear to be a practical need to manage regulators on ACPI > systems, using ad-hoc properties to describe regulators to the kernel presents > a number of problems (especially should ACPI gain first class support for such > things), and there are ongoing discussions as to how to manage this. > > Until there is a rough consensus, revert commit 13bed58ce8748d43,
FWIW, I overlooked this one somehow and I agree that it shouldn't have been applied in the first place. Did it actually go to linux-acpi, BTW? Thanks, Rafael
