On Mon 23-01-17 13:16:40, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Dirty pages can easily reach the end of the LRU while there are still
> clean pages to reclaim around. Don't let kswapd write them back just
> because there are a lot of them. It costs more CPU to find the clean
> pages, but that's almost certainly better than to disrupt writeback
> from the flushers with LRU-order single-page writes from reclaim. And
> the flushers have been woken up by that point, so we spend IO capacity
> on flushing and CPU capacity on finding the clean cache.
> 
> Only start writing dirty pages if they have cycled around the LRU
> twice now and STILL haven't been queued on the IO device. It's
> possible that the dirty pages are so sparsely distributed across
> different bdis, inodes, memory cgroups, that the flushers take forever
> to get to the ones we want reclaimed. Once we see them twice on the
> LRU, we know that's the quicker way to find them, so do LRU writeback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 915fc658de41..df0fe0cc438e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1153,13 +1153,18 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct 
> list_head *page_list,
>  
>               if (PageDirty(page)) {
>                       /*
> -                      * Only kswapd can writeback filesystem pages to
> -                      * avoid risk of stack overflow but only writeback
> -                      * if many dirty pages have been encountered.
> +                      * Only kswapd can writeback filesystem pages
> +                      * to avoid risk of stack overflow. But avoid
> +                      * injecting inefficient single-page IO into
> +                      * flusher writeback as much as possible: only
> +                      * write pages when we've encountered many
> +                      * dirty pages, and when we've already scanned
> +                      * the rest of the LRU for clean pages and see
> +                      * the same dirty pages again (PageReclaim).
>                        */
>                       if (page_is_file_cache(page) &&
> -                                     (!current_is_kswapd() ||
> -                                      !test_bit(PGDAT_DIRTY, 
> &pgdat->flags))) {
> +                         (!current_is_kswapd() || !PageReclaim(page) ||
> +                          !test_bit(PGDAT_DIRTY, &pgdat->flags))) {
>                               /*
>                                * Immediately reclaim when written back.
>                                * Similar in principal to deactivate_page()
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]";> [email protected] </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to