On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:50:45PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:56:43AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > What's wrong with that? > > I had been asking around on "what is the fundamental unit of res mgmt > for vservers" and the answer I got (from Herbert) was "all tasks that are > in the same pid namespace". From what you are saying above, it seems to > be that there is no such "fundamental" unit. It can be a random mixture > of tasks (taken across vservers) whose resource consumption needs to be > controlled. Is that correct?
just means that the current Linux-VServer behaviour is a subset of that, no problem there as long as it really _is_ a subset :) we always like to provide more features in the future, no problem with that :) best, Herbert > > > echo "cid 2" > /dev/cpu/prof/tasks > > > > Adding that feature sounds fine, > > Ok yes ..that can be a optional feature. > > -- > Regards, > vatsa > _______________________________________________ > Containers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
