On Jan 27 2017 or thereabouts, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> These tests looks reversed.
> A warning should be displayed if an error is returned, not on success.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
> ---

Good catch!

Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>

Cheers,
Benjamin


>  drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> index 11447ab1055c..bf5c36e229ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> @@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ void rmi_enable_irq(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev, bool 
> clear_wake)
>       data->enabled = true;
>       if (clear_wake && device_may_wakeup(rmi_dev->xport->dev)) {
>               retval = disable_irq_wake(irq);
> -             if (!retval)
> +             if (retval)
>                       dev_warn(&rmi_dev->dev,
>                                "Failed to disable irq for wake: %d\n",
>                                retval);
> @@ -936,7 +936,7 @@ void rmi_disable_irq(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev, bool 
> enable_wake)
>       disable_irq(irq);
>       if (enable_wake && device_may_wakeup(rmi_dev->xport->dev)) {
>               retval = enable_irq_wake(irq);
> -             if (!retval)
> +             if (retval)
>                       dev_warn(&rmi_dev->dev,
>                                "Failed to enable irq for wake: %d\n",
>                                retval);
> -- 
> 2.9.3
> 

Reply via email to