On Tuesday 13 March 2007 12:12, Nick Piggin wrote: > > I guess googlemalloc (tcmalloc?) isn't suitable for a general purpose > glibc allocator. But I wonder if there are other improvements that glibc > can do here?
I cooked a patch some time ago to speedup threaded apps and got no feedback. http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/9/26 Maybe we have to wait for 32 core cpu before thinking of cache line bouncings... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
