On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:54:07PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@majess.pl>
>
> This patch provides separate set of pwm ops utilized by
> i.MX's PWMv1 and PWMv2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <l...@karo-electronics.de>
> Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra...@toradex.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@majess.pl>
> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Changes for v5:
> - None
>
> Changes for v4:
> - None
>
> Changes for v3:
> - Adjust the code to work with ipg clock removed
>
> Changes for v2:
> - New patch
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> index b1d1e50..0fa480d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,14 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> struct pwm_device *pwm)
> clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
> }
>
> -static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops = {
> +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = {
> + .enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> + .disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> + .config = imx_pwm_config,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = {Can't these two be const? No need to respin for only this, just let me know and I can make the change while applying. Thierry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
