On Mon 30 Jan 14:01 PST 2017, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 23 Jan 17:48 PST 2017, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
>
> > The "remoteproc{0,1...}" sysfs entries are added in
> > rproc_add() and deleted in rproc_type_release() instead of
> > in rproc_del(). That leaves these lingering entries sticking
> > around after we return from rproc_del(). Move the
> > rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del() to fix this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjo...@codeaurora.org>
>
> I moved the rproc_delete_debug_dir() below the list_del() region to
> allow reuse of the critical region in the upcoming "deleted" patch.
>
Never mind, I failed at reading. I re-applied this as is.
Regards,
Bjorn
> Applied, thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > index 953ee29..78200a7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > @@ -1315,8 +1315,6 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev)
> >
> > dev_info(&rproc->dev, "releasing %s\n", rproc->name);
> >
> > - rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc);
> > -
> > idr_destroy(&rproc->notifyids);
> >
> > if (rproc->index >= 0)
> > @@ -1491,6 +1489,8 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
> > if (rproc->auto_boot)
> > rproc_shutdown(rproc);
> >
> > + rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc);
> > +
> > /* the rproc is downref'ed as soon as it's removed from the klist */
> > mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
> > list_del(&rproc->node);
> > --
> > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> >
