Am 31.01.2017 um 16:53 schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
> 
> Checking for ret < 0 is redundant because a previous check on ret
> being non-zero already handles the ret < 0 case. Remove the redundant
> code. Found by CoverityScan, CID#1398863, CID#1398864
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>

Thanks,
//richard

Reply via email to