Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Can you disassemble this function for me?  There are several possible paths
> > and without the argument to the syscall and whether there's a key that was
> > matched, it's hard to say which path is being taken - but this might help
> > determine that.
> 
> Here it is:
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/65efc41d00ef0033f9374853b9265c71/raw/9d8540dfb199b81f3d3534ec4cc6da378d07f5b2/gistfile1.txt

Okay, it's called from here:

ffffffff820490fd:       lea    -0x1b0(%rbp),%rdi
ffffffff82049104:       callq  ffffffff82047800 <construct_get_dest_keyring>
ffffffff82049109:       mov    -0x1b0(%rbp),%rdi
ffffffff82049110:       mov    %r15,%rsi
ffffffff82049113:       callq  ffffffff8203efd0 <key_link>  <---
ffffffff82049118:       mov    -0x1b0(%rbp),%rdi
ffffffff8204911f:       mov    %eax,%r14d
ffffffff82049122:       callq  ffffffff82037ab0 <key_put>

Which should correspond to this:

        key_ref = search_process_keyrings(&ctx);

        if (!IS_ERR(key_ref)) {
                key = key_ref_to_ptr(key_ref);
                if (dest_keyring) {
                        construct_get_dest_keyring(&dest_keyring);
                        ret = key_link(dest_keyring, key);  <---
                        key_put(dest_keyring);
                        if (ret < 0) {
                                key_put(key);
                                key = ERR_PTR(ret);
                                goto error_free;
                        }
                }

which means that the search was successful, the requested key already exists
and there was a destination keyring nominated by userspace.  The first
conditional clause of construct_get_dest_keyring() must've been true:

        struct key *dest_keyring = *_dest_keyring
        ...
        if (dest_keyring) {
                /* the caller supplied one */
                key_get(dest_keyring);
        } else {

because it matches the containing if-condition in the calling function.

> I actually know what were the arguments to the syscall. Since it
> happened in a user process context, I know what syzkaller program it
> was running at the time of the crash. It's just they are not
> reproducible. Here are the 3 programs, and they are almost equivalent
> as far as I can see. It's in syzkaller format, but I hope you can
> decipher it, it's just syscall names, address and data in hex:
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/19bd59ffa286a74b49ca2371b69d4c5c/raw/004eaaa58a4ca775c008591fbb94eae78f92ef86/gistfile1.txt

add_key(&(0x7f0000d02000)="6465616400", ...

What does the "6465616400" represent?  A string containing only numeric
characters or are these 2-digit hex codes and the string is actually "dead"?

David

Reply via email to