On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 17:41 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> There is no reason why statically defined properties should be
> modifiable,
> so let's make device_add_properties() and the rest of pset_*()
> functions to
> take const pointers to properties.
> 
> This will allow us to mark properties as const/__initconst at
> definition
> sites.
> 

Looks good to me.

FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>

Though, nitpicks below.
 
>  static struct property_set *pset_copy_set(const struct property_set
> *pset)
>  {
> -     const struct property_entry *entry;
> +     struct property_entry *props;

Can we leave the name?
 
> -     p->properties = kcalloc(n + 1, sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> +     p->properties = props = kcalloc(n + 1, sizeof(*props),
> GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!p->properties) {
>               kfree(p);
>               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>       }
>  
>       for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {

> -             int ret = pset_copy_entry(&p->properties[i],
> +             int ret = pset_copy_entry(&props[i],
>                                         &pset->properties[i]);

Do we need these changes?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

Reply via email to