Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 19:10:34 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:55:07PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > From: Jingju Hou <houji...@marvell.com>
> >
> > From: Jingju Hou <houji...@marvell.com>
> >
> > The mvneta itself does not support WOL, but the PHY might.
> > So pass the calls to the PHY
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingju Hou <houji...@marvell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszh...@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > since v3:
> > - really fix the build error
>
> Keep trying....
>
> But maybe tomorrow, after you have taken the pause Dave said you
> should take, and maybe ask Jingju to really review it, in detail.
Jingju is a newbie in the Linux kernel community. She made a mistake
when trying to send the old patch. I picked up her patch when she went
on vacation, fixed the error and send it out on behalf of her.
>
> >
> > since v2,v1:
> > - using phy_dev member in struct net_device
> > - add commit msg
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > index 6dcc951af0ff..02611fa1c3b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > @@ -3929,6 +3929,25 @@ static int mvneta_ethtool_get_rxfh(struct net_device
> > *dev, u32 *indir, u8 *key,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void mvneta_ethtool_get_wol(struct net_device *dev,
> > + struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> > +{
> > + wol->supported = 0;
> > + wol->wolopts = 0;
> > +
> > + if (dev->phydev)
> > + return phy_ethtool_get_wol(dev->phydev, wol);
>
> This is a void function. And you are returning a value. And
> phy_ethtool_get_wol() is also a void function, so does not actually
> return anything.
Thanks for catching it, fixed in v4, can you please review?
