On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:16:52 +0100 Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com> wrote:
> > > just in case, the patch (which I prefer to be ignored) > > > > let's keep printk_safe_flush_line(). > > I do not have strong opinion but I would slightly prefer > to keep the helper function. The use of printk_deferred() > is a bit tricky and it is better to have only one copy. > > Steven, could you live with the original patch, please? Sure, but make it into a static inline. -- Steve
