On 02/05/2017 10:32 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 04/02/17 21:47, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 02/04/2017 10:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 02/03/2017 06:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c 
>>>>> b/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c
>>>>> index 0c44f72c32a8..331ff9a673be 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c
>>>>> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static int rcar_gyroadc_parse_subdevs(struct iio_dev 
>>>>> *indio_dev)
>>>>>       struct device_node *child;
>>>>>       struct regulator *vref;
>>>>>       unsigned int reg;
>>>>> -     unsigned int adcmode, childmode;
>>>>> +     unsigned int adcmode = -1, childmode;
>>>>>       unsigned int sample_width;
>>>>>       unsigned int num_channels;
>>>>>       int ret, first = 1;
>>>>> @@ -366,6 +366,9 @@ static int rcar_gyroadc_parse_subdevs(struct iio_dev 
>>>>> *indio_dev)
>>>>>                       channels = rcar_gyroadc_iio_channels_3;
>>>>>                       num_channels = 
>>>>> ARRAY_SIZE(rcar_gyroadc_iio_channels_3);
>>>>>                       break;
>>>>> +             default:
>>>>> +                     dev_err(dev, "unknown device type");
>>>>
>>>> Is this verbose output really needed ?
>>>
>>> I don't care much either way, I was just trying to follow what the function 
>>> does
>>> for the other failure cases. We can probably drop it though, as this
>>> would indicate
>>> a bug in the driver implementation, while the others are about
>>> incorrect DT data.
>>
>> I don't really want to pester you too much with minor details, let's
>> wait for JIC's opinion. If you're resending, please add my Ack,
>> otherwise consider this patch:
>>
>> Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com>
>>
> I've applied with the dev_err dropped.  Didn't care that much either
> way :)

Noone seems to care much, but everyone is slightly opinionated, hehe :)

> Anyhow, applied to the fixes-togreg-post-rc1 branch of iio.git as
> I might not get another pull request out pre the merge window.
> (if I do I'll apply it with that).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
> 
Thanks

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

Reply via email to