On 08/02/2017 14:33, Radim Krčmář wrote: > 2017-02-08 11:04+0100, Paolo Bonzini: >> On 07/02/2017 22:52, Radim Krčmář wrote: >>> there might be some rough >>> edges with nested, but it was broken even before, and they fix at least >>> one known bug. >> >> I don't think so, nested IRQ injection is tested very well. Why do you >> say it was broken even before? > > I was basing on recent bug report where we missed IOMMU injection in a > non-nested case [1]. While we do cover the non-nested case with this > series, I think we still miss posted interrupts from IOMMU that should > trigger a nested VM exit from L2 to L1 -- details in review of [6/6]. > > 1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg144355.html
Uh, nice. Totally missed that. Paolo
