On Thu 2017-02-09 16:58:29, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > + > >> > +This is a binding for a gpio controlled switch for camera interfaces. > >> > Such a > >> > +device is used on some embedded devices to connect two cameras to the > >> > same > >> > +interface of a image signal processor. > >> > + > >> > +Required properties > >> > +=================== > >> > + > >> > +compatible : must contain "video-bus-switch" > >> > >> video-bus-gpio-mux > > > > Sakari already asked for rename here. I believe I waited reasonable > > time, but got no input from you, so I did rename it. Now you decide on > > different name. > > > > Can we either get timely reactions or less bikeshedding? > > You mean less than 5 days because I don't see any other version of > this? But in short, no, you can't.
Could we switch device tree bindings from "cc: subsystem, to: device
tree" to "to: subsystem, cc: device tree" mode? Currently it takes
more effort to merge the device tree parts than the relevant driver,
and that is not quite good.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
