Test against a simple proc_dointvec() case. While at it, add
a test against INT_MAX. Make sure INT_MAX works, and INT_MAX+1
will fail. Also test negative values work.

Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@kernel.org>
---
 lib/test_sysctl.c                        | 11 ++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_sysctl.c b/lib/test_sysctl.c
index 9b9ae1a95ab3..c36a024d7351 100644
--- a/lib/test_sysctl.c
+++ b/lib/test_sysctl.c
@@ -34,11 +34,15 @@ static int i_one_hundred = 100;
 
 struct test_sysctl_data {
        int int_0001;
+       int int_0002;
+
        char string_0001[65];
 };
 
 static struct test_sysctl_data test_data = {
        .int_0001 = 60,
+       .int_0002 = 1,
+
        .string_0001 = "(none)",
 };
 
@@ -54,6 +58,13 @@ static struct ctl_table test_table[] = {
                .extra2         = &i_one_hundred,
        },
        {
+               .procname       = "int_0002",
+               .data           = &test_data.int_0002,
+               .maxlen         = sizeof(int),
+               .mode           = 0644,
+               .proc_handler   = proc_dointvec,
+       },
+       {
                .procname       = "string_0001",
                .data           = &test_data.string_0001,
                .maxlen         = sizeof(test_data.string_0001),
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh 
b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
index 14b9d875db42..45fd2ee5739c 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ TEST_FILE=$(mktemp)
 # we have tons of space.
 ALL_TESTS="0001:1:1"
 ALL_TESTS="$ALL_TESTS 0002:1:1"
+ALL_TESTS="$ALL_TESTS 0003:1:1"
 
 test_modprobe()
 {
@@ -52,6 +53,9 @@ function allow_user_defaults()
        if [ -z $MAX_DIGITS ]; then
                MAX_DIGITS=$(($PAGE_SIZE/8))
        fi
+       if [ -z $INT_MAX ]; then
+               INT_MAX=$(getconf INT_MAX)
+       fi
 }
 
 test_reqs()
@@ -92,6 +96,9 @@ reset_vals()
                int_0001)
                        VAL="60"
                        ;;
+               int_0002)
+                       VAL="1"
+                       ;;
                string_0001)
                        VAL="(none)"
                        ;;
@@ -261,6 +268,48 @@ run_limit_digit()
        test_rc
 }
 
+# You are using an int
+run_limit_digit_int()
+{
+       echo -n "Testing INT_MAX works ..."
+       reset_vals
+       TEST_STR="$INT_MAX"
+       echo -n $TEST_STR > $TARGET
+
+       if ! verify "${TARGET}"; then
+               echo "FAIL" >&2
+               rc=1
+       else
+               echo "ok"
+       fi
+       test_rc
+
+       echo -n "Testing INT_MAX + 1 will fail as expected..."
+       reset_vals
+       TEST_STR=$(($INT_MAX+1))
+       echo -n $TEST_STR > $TARGET 2> /dev/null
+
+       if verify "${TARGET}"; then
+               echo "FAIL" >&2
+               rc=1
+       else
+               echo "ok"
+       fi
+       test_rc
+
+       echo -n "Testing negative values will work as expected..."
+       reset_vals
+       TEST_STR="-3"
+       echo -n $TEST_STR > $TARGET 2> /dev/null
+       if ! verify "${TARGET}"; then
+               echo "FAIL" >&2
+               rc=1
+       else
+               echo "ok"
+       fi
+       test_rc
+}
+
 run_stringtests()
 {
        echo -n "Writing entire sysctl in short writes ... "
@@ -354,6 +403,18 @@ sysctl_test_0002()
        run_stringtests
 }
 
+sysctl_test_0003()
+{
+       TARGET="${SYSCTL}/int_0002"
+       reset_vals
+       ORIG=$(cat "${TARGET}")
+       TEST_STR=$(( $ORIG + 1 ))
+
+       run_numerictests
+       run_limit_digit
+       run_limit_digit_int
+}
+
 list_tests()
 {
        echo "Test ID list:"
@@ -364,6 +425,7 @@ list_tests()
        echo
        echo "0001 x $(get_test_count 0001) - tests proc_dointvec_minmax()"
        echo "0002 x $(get_test_count 0002) - tests proc_dostring()"
+       echo "0003 x $(get_test_count 0003) - tests proc_dointvec()"
 }
 
 test_reqs
-- 
2.11.0

Reply via email to