Re: [tip:locking/core] refcount_t: Introduce a special purpose refcount type

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:

> > > And since size then isn't an issue what so ever anymore, remove the debug 
> > > knob and make all WARN()s unconditional.
> > 
> > Are you still going to land the x86 WARN_ON improvements?
> 
> Yes, once I manage to eke some response out of the relevant arch maintainers 
> on 
> the subject ;-)

so I'm enthusiastically in support of it all! Does that count as a response? ;-)

Thanks,

        Ingo