On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:21:08 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 14:24 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > /me repeats wish that Not Everything Should Be Sent to lkml. :( > > If you do statement like this, please, provide reasons why you say it > for these patches and suggest something _constructive_. I do not see any > point in this vague phrase.
so do you believe that Everything (that is kernel-related) should be sent to lkml? > And please, note, I was directed here by David Woodhouse who is MTD > maintainer because he thinks the patch is large and needs more people to > look at it, not just him. As I wrote to Mr. Boyer, that makes sense in this case. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/