Hi! > > Seeing a couple of MSI changes in there, on a hunch I booted latest tree > > with > > pci=nomsi, and it resumed again. > > > > Any ideas how to further debug this? > > I'll try backing out individual changes from that merge tomorrow. > > Thanks. > > Of those msi patches you have identified I don't see anything really > obvious. And you actually marked them as good in your bisect so > I don't expect it is core problem. > > We do have a known e1000 regression, with msi and suspend/resume. > So it is possible the nomsi avoided a driver problem. Especially > as we have a number of driver changes on the on Linus's side of > that merge. > > I also know we have some known issues with pci_save_state and > pci_restore_state that require them to be paired for correct > operation. For suspend and resume that is not generally a problem. > > I have fixes for the pci_save_state and pci_restore_state in the -mm > and gregkh tree's. Since they also happen to fix the e1000 driver as > a side effect they are worth looking at, at least if you have an > e1000. > > I don't have a clue which hardware the x60 has so I don't know which > drivers it would be using.
x60 indeed has e1000. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
