On 15.2.2017 19:02, Moritz Fischer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Alan Tull <at...@kernel.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> >> wrote: > >>>> #define FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG BIT(0) >>>> #define FPGA_MGR_EXTERNAL_CONFIG BIT(1) >>>> +#define FPGA_MGR_DECRYPT_BITSTREAM BIT(2) >>>> >>>> /** >>>> * struct fpga_image_info - information specific to a FPGA image >>>> >>> >>> Isn't it better to state that bitstream is encrypted >>> instead of saying that bitstream requires decryption? >> >> Such as FPGA_MGR_ENCRYPTED_BITSTREAM ? > > Yeah, can do. This was basically a 'redo' of my earlier 'capability' based > patchset. There it made more sense to have a 'can decrypt' capability.
Just keep in your mind that there are use cases where you also need to pass keys. Thanks, Michal
