I think the definition of ISAPNP_DEVICE in
linux-2.4.0-test11-pre5/include/linux/isapnp.h is unnecessarily complex.
Here is a proposed patch.

Adam J. Richter     __     ______________   4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]     \ /                  San Jose, California 95129-1034
+1 408 261-6630         | g g d r a s i l   United States of America
fax +1 408 261-6631      "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."


--- linux/include/linux/isapnp.h.orig   Thu Nov 16 02:20:14 2000
+++ linux/include/linux/isapnp.h        Thu Nov 16 02:20:33 2000
@@ -42,10 +42,8 @@
 #define ISAPNP_VENDOR(a,b,c)   (((((a)-'A'+1)&0x3f)<<2)|\
                                ((((b)-'A'+1)&0x18)>>3)|((((b)-'A'+1)&7)<<13)|\
                                ((((c)-'A'+1)&0x1f)<<8))
-#define ISAPNP_DEVICE(x)       ((((x)&0xf000)>>8)|\
-                                (((x)&0x0f00)>>8)|\
-                                (((x)&0x00f0)<<8)|\
-                                (((x)&0x000f)<<8))
+#define ISAPNP_DEVICE(x)       ((((x)&0xff00)>>8)|\
+                                (((x)&0x00ff)<<8))
 #define ISAPNP_FUNCTION(x)     ISAPNP_DEVICE(x)
 
 /*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to