Hi Rob,

On Wednesday 15 Feb 2017 16:08:22 Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:41:16PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > This makes the example more or less correspond with the da850-evm
> > hardware setup.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt    | 35 +++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Spoke too soon...
> 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt index
> > 9c7510b..543f6f3 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
> > @@ -28,19 +28,27 @@ I2C-connected TVP5147 decoder:
> >             reg = <0x217000 0x1000>;
> >             interrupts = <92>;
> > 
> > -           port {
> > -                   vpif_ch0: endpoint@0 {
> > +           port@0 {
> > +                   vpif_input_ch0: endpoint@0 {
> >                             reg = <0>;
> >                             bus-width = <8>;
> > -                           remote-endpoint = <&composite>;
> > +                           remote-endpoint = <&composite_in>;
> >                     };
> > 
> > -                   vpif_ch1: endpoint@1 {
> > +                   vpif_input_ch1: endpoint@1 {
> >                             reg = <1>;
> >                             bus-width = <8>;
> >                             data-shift = <8>;
> >                     };
> >             };
> > +
> > +           port@1 {
> 
> The binding doc says nothing about supporting a 2nd port.
> 
> > +                   vpif_output_ch0: endpoint@0 {
> > +                           reg = <0>;
> 
> Don't need reg here.

And the node should then be named endpoint, not endpoint@0.

> > +                           bus-width = <8>;
> > +                           remote-endpoint = <&composite_out>;
> > +                   };
> > +           };
> >     };

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Reply via email to