----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bandan Das" <b...@redhat.com>
> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, k...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 1:04:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: use vmcs_set/clear_bits for CPU-based 
> execution controls
> 
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> 
> I took a quick look and found these two potential
> consumers of these set/clear wrappers.
> 
> vmcs_set_secondary_exec_control()
> vmx_set_virtual_x2apic_mode()
> 
> Since this has been reviewed already,
> we can just have them later in a follow up
> (unless you left them out intentionally).

Both of these can both set and clear bits, so they could be the
consumer of a new function

void vmcs_write_bits(u16 field, u32 value, u32 mask)

but I don't see much benefit in introducing it; the cognitive
load is higher than vmcs_{set,clear}_bits.

Paolo

Reply via email to