On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:08, Mike Galbraith wrote: > P.S. "utter failure" was too harsh. What sticks in my craw is that the > world has to adjust to fit this new scheduler.
If a new scheduler has a better 'normal' performance adjusting to its quirks is fine. Your testing is important. We need to understand what needs to be tweaked and why. >From my POV 0.30 is better than mainline - it handles my load(s) better. Thanks Ed Tomlinson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
