On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:32:21PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > Hi, > > Since an epoll fd can be added to another epoll fd, I'm wondering if you > have enough data here to figure that out. The inode is the > 'anon_inode_inode', so I'm wondering if that is sufficient to distinguish it > from other anonymous inodes, or if an extra bit is required to indicate if > the target file is in fact and epoll fd.
I think it should be ebough (together with sdev and pos). But will look more closely tomorrow once I sit implementing criu support :) (that's why it is early rfc, to gather comments)
